|
How To Build a Cajon - Snares |
|
|
|
|
Written by Casey
|
|
Friday, August 14 2009 14:43 |
|
Page 7 of 12
 
I don't recommend the snare setup depicted here. Read on for more info.
Ah, the snares. Perhaps the strings weren't thick enough (classical guitar "A" strings), perhaps they shouldn't have been so far up in the corners (longer strings = more mass), perhaps my notion of the "snare" sound is different from typical cajonares, perhaps my tapa is warped; but the snares seemed ineffectual, even after considerable tweaking. Here, anyway, is how they are set up. The image on the left shows the tapa before screwing and the various pilot holes in the tapa and the internal frame. The red lines show where the tapa screws will hold it (there are only three along the top of the tapa, the middle one was already screwed in once, thus the hole looks larger). Also visible are six large holes in the frame in two sets of three (which will hold the zither pins from the inside) and, above each of them (actually below them in the image; one is indicated with the blue arrow) is a small hole through which will pass a snare string (i broke and lost drill bit in the string hole rightmost in the picture, thus a secondary hole had to be drilled). Leading from the exit of these snare string holes is a groove where the string will lie (as demonstrated by the yellow line.) The string passes along the inside face of the tapa, through the groove, into the string hole, and finally wraps around the zither pin on the inside-face of the hickory frame. On the other side of each string, it passes through a similar groove and through another small hole; it is simply knotted on the other side of the hole to hold the string. The grooves are cut to both prevent the string from pressing or bulging the tapa (which could also affect the seal) and so that the string is not unduly stressed as it is tensioned or released. It may be a good idea to grade the entrances to the string hole so there isn't such a sharp edge for it to pass over. I have broken one string so far in my snare tweaking, and it was at this edge. Werner wrote in to say that he used a temporary small helper board screwed into the frame to act as a "pretend tapa". He then used blocks to hold the strings against this temporary board. Once those blocks were permanently installed, with the strings passing over them, he removed the temporary board and installed the tapa, which in turn had a nice close fit with the strings.
There are many, many variables in the instrument that affect whether or not the snare works well, not to mention a wide variety of opinions as to what a good snare sounds like, so it's hard to say what kind is best.
Standard zither pins (a.k.a. "tuning pins") are available online or, better, from your local friendly music store. The proper way to use them is apparently to drill the hole and then hammer them most of the way in (screwing them in can apparently cause them not to hold their tune as well over time.) It's probably not crucial in this application since the snares will never be at particularly high tensions. Ocaña describes the tension as just enough to hold them against the face to cause a rattle. [read on, below...]
 Ocaña recommends a small piece of tape along the middle of the snare to help ensure contact with the face. This didn't help me. Perhaps my tapa doesn't resonate enough after a strike, but there didn't seem to be enough leftover energy to drive a snare that required driving. Thus i changed over to a "rattle" system: the rattles get their energy from the initial strike, and the mass of the rattles (coupled with the bounce of the snare string which was repurposed to mount and tension the rattles against the face) allows that energy to continue sounding after the strike. It worked well (after a lot of time spent trying different shapes and sizes and careful tensioning of the strings to get just the right rattle without lingering noise, etc.) The wire used is 12-gauge copper grounding wire from some extra electrical cable (just what was around, and it seemed massive enough). The finer wires (from old twist ties) are just there to hold the rattles in the optimum locations.

The rattle setup was a good start: an edgy, barky snare, but the rattles are, well, rattly, and the snare sound was still on the short side and lacking in higher-frequency shimmer. I took old "E" steel guitar strings (.52 or .54 inch diameter, not sure which it was), carefully unwound the wrapping from the core, and gradually made 10 5-inch long pieces that i joined with some hammered copper 12-gauge wire and electrical solder to form a somewhat fancier custom snare that went in the other corner (the strings were slackened and just pulled out of the way). Two zither pins were used to mount the snare assembly: the top pin could be used with a string tied to the strategic bend in the wire (near where the actual snares connect) as a tensioner of the snare, but it didn't seem necessary, and is not done in this picture. (The old classical guitar string snares with some rattles are still hanging around loose in the picture, they are not contributing to the sound.) A whole lot of time was spent straightening and tweaking with the very finest degree of accuracy the lie of these snares so that they sounded but did not rattle excessively, etc. The combination of the two snare systems sounded nice. (Note that the snare tweaking was done after construction was finished, since you need to test it with the real instrument, but it's included here out of order.)
However, the best snare system, in my humble opinion, is to purchase a snare drum snare, clip off one end of it (in so doing, you probably want to shorten it to an appropriate length, as they are quite long), and then figure a way to mount it in your cajon. This is what i have done, and it's my favorite system by far. Perhaps it's not a traditional cajon sound, but it's what i was looking for. I have mounted it on the same copper wire which i use to tension, position, and otherwise adjust the lay of the snares against the tapa. This alignment is crucial, and tricky, and requires tweaking, (and some re-tweaking, especially while traveling with the cajon). Perhaps there is a nifty way to have it lay correctly and never fall out of alignment. I seek this method, but have not found it yet. In the mean time, it's like tuning your guitar: a nice moment to get in touch with your instrument before playing. :-) Pictures of this system are forthcoming; it's essentially the same as my "home-made" snare described above, but a lot more effective. If there is too much tension towards the tapa, or too steep an angle, the snare wires curve up to the tapa and then continue bending and "reflect" off the tapa face. If the tension against the tapa is too weak, or angle is too slight, the wires won't make good contact. Remember to adjust this while the tapa is leaning back (if you play with a backwards lean).
There are, of course, many other snare designs for the cajon, (see the other links section, as well as the readers respond section.) Some use snares all the way across the center of the face, which i would expect to reduce the separation of the kick and snare sounds. Many cajones (such as those from Meinl) allow the snare to be disengaged completely, to allow a more hollow, ringing high sound. I didn't bother, given my personal intentions for the instrument.
In the further notes (english translation, without images), Ocaña says: "I hope ... that percussionists would restring their cajones, just as guitarists change strings on their guitars, to get their own, personal sound."
|
|
Last Updated on Sunday, October 17 2010 11:15 |
...with a couple amendments that I haven't updated the article with:
- now that my door is better sealed, hole size does indeed matter. Smaller = deeper resonant pitch of kick sound, as you'd expect; too small = too deep.
- i'd put it in the back, maybe lower back actually, contrary to what the article says, but upper back seems to be the collective wisdom, so maybe that's right.
As far as overall impact on the sound that hole location has, ignoring the placement of the instrument against walls and so forth, I can't say; haven't done enough experimentation. I'd be surprised if it made a big difference.
-c
I don't have any experience with Masonite, really... my impression is that there'd be a lot of internal damping and it'd be kind of floppy, so it's probably not the first thing i'd reach for, but who knows... maybe it would have a nice dull thud without non-harmonic overtones, etc. I think we need more experimentation with cajon tapas, so hey, give it a shot and report back. :-) The birch plywood i used for mine seemed awful floppy as well before it was screwed down on the frame, so maybe masonite would be ok. As long as you don't glue it, it should be easy to try a couple or even several different materials for the tapa.
Good luck,
-c
I was curious what your thoughts were on using Masonite for the tapa?
I've been promising an update to this site for a year now, but i swear to god it's coming, hopefully this winter. I did a bunch of home-spun research on the resonance issues with the kick sound / tapa / helmholtz chamber / etc and can't wait to compare notes with that PDF. I also installed a couple pickups in my cajon and will share info about that.
I mention somewhere in this article that the hole size doesn't seem to affect the kick pitch, but I think that was due to my door. More later, but suffice to say that it does, now that I've made some modifications.
Regarding your comments:
- yeah, it's amazing how much better a home-made cajon can sound than a store-bought cajon.
- snare wise, my vote is still for clipped snares (one end free) angled up in to the corners. The trouble is the mounting system, but if you sort that out it's the best separation i've found. It takes a lot of careful adjustment though, for sure. I spend probably an hour tweaking with it when i first set it up... has to lie just right with the right tension or it "slaps" as you say. My new snare uses a very thick electrical cable (gauge 10 i think... underground feeder cable for a 100 amp panel).
- in terms of two compartments... i've never played a 2-compartment cajon i liked, but i haven't played many (1 or 2). Seems like you'd be undercutting whatever vibration the kick was going to have... i.e. why not just make two drums, at that point. I've also found that playing technique can eventually help with the separation, once you get to know your cajon.
- I saw somewhere on the internet a kick pedal for cajon... it turns 180 degrees so you can play it normally and it kicks towards you. I think it was expensive. I have a regular pedal and might try modifying it some day, but not soon. :-) If someone finds that, let me know, and i'll link to it.
-c
Nice big bass and surprisingly crisp sound - like a tight heavy kit - the tapa was a very thin but dense ply I found on an old wardrobe. Easily as loud as the bought one his uncle played the day before (http://www.tocapercussion.com/product/ethnic/cajon.html)
Playing around with the with snare: Tried the curtain hanging wire (2m for $3.80 Bunnings) and very easy to strip, then stretch. Trouble is, very difficult to isolate snare from bass. Started with crosswise like http://caseyconnor.org/cajonstuff/images/johnscajon3.png but way too much snare on bass hit. Tried just on corner which was better but still not isolating very well, and more "slappy" than "buzzy". Also wondering if it would work to divide the box into 2 compartments, a lower (roughly square) box for the bass and the top would be for slap and snare. Another question - why not rig up a bass kick so we can have 2 hands free plus kick bass...
Anyway... Still experimenting...
i just change my blog name. it is now become
http://isdcajon.blogspot.com/
visit us
thank you
Blockboard is stronger than plywood and has enough density. google it, you'll have more information about it.
i make them quickly? i just can't waste my time by daydreaming:-)lol
thanks for the inspiration Casey
Blockboard - had to look that up. It worked well? Strong enough, etc?
I think maybe you have misunderstood "ocana". Germán Ocaña is a person -- a cajon builder who provided a lot of the data I used to make my cajon (see info, above.) As far as I'm aware, it's not a part of the cajon.
Glad your design is coming along.
i just build a new one. this time i don't use plywood or MDF but i take blockboard. i use it coz i think it is healthier than MDF. and the result is quite satisfying! its dimension is 11.5'x11.5'x17.5'. unlike the previous one, i can feel more bass sound. well, the thickness of the back ocana might be the thing and i put the 13cm hole right in the middle. and i add another thing here, that is ADJUSTABLE SNARE! it's a real thing man. just get into my blog to see it. thank you Casey!
saint avee
insaintdesign.blogspot.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UA7TdAAPIR4
thank you
saint avee-inSaint Design cajon
I don't think MDF would sound any different than plywood, and it might be harder to work with (e.g. screwing the tapa on might split it?) I don't have much experience with it. Other than that, I don't think using it would hurt anything. But I would concentrate on the size, the tapa, and the snare type/placement: that's where the sound is really decided. After that, the sound seal, the way the tapa is screwed (how many screws, how it sits on the internal frame, where the screws are), and maybe the orientation of the tapa grain (?). I have found that the hole size is almost irrelevant, and I am guessing that the material used in the sides is pretty unimportant. A comment below stated: "The choice of materials that you use will decide the tone of the cajon. The harder the wood, the more cutting the sound will be. The softer the wood the more warm it will be. You don't want to go too far either way, look for a wood that will have a nice balance. One of my favorite choices for the shell of a cajon is poplar."
I did see your blog. Very pretty. :-)
i make it smaller since in my country, indonesia, the average people height is only about 170 cm and i'm only 160 cm.
what do you think about using 12 mm MDF to replace the body?
did you see my blog already?
http://insaintdesign.blogspot.com/
i use 3 mm plywood for tapa and i don't glue it to its body, i use screw as you said.
snappy snare here is the wire that is used below the real drum snare. i cut it into two and set it inside the cajon toward the inside tapa.
while, the hole diameter is 13 cm.
What do you mean by "snappy" snare?
How thick is your tapa? Is it plywood also?
this is the stuff
http://insaintdesign.blogspot.com/
would you please help me. Thank you
Keep in mind that the layers (plies) of wood that constitute plywood are typically oriented at 90 degrees to each other, so I would guess that orienting a plywood tapa with the visible outside grain horizontally wouldn't have a big impact, but I suppose it would depend on how many layers your plywood has, what orientation they all are, etc. I put the indicator of the grain direction in the plans because it made sense to me, but there was no especially profound reason for it, to be honest. :-) It just seemed like a predominantly vertical-grain tapa (mine is 3-ply, so the outer 2 plies are vertical) would flex more along the vertical axis (meaning, the predominant "crease" in the bending tapa runs vertically), giving the tapa a longer resonant period and thus lower sound, presuming that the cajon is taller than it is wide.
With a solid wood tapa, however, I would expect a difference. My instinct still says vertical grain, and I think that's what I've seen on expert-made instruments, but maybe you could check some pics on the internet to be sure.
If you don't glue your tapa, it's pretty easy to just make a couple and experiment.
I would like to know if it is a must to have thre tapa vertical grain ?
Will this change the sound?
I posted back in March about my adjustable snare idea and the "flip-top" access door. I finally got around to building my first cajon with a whole lot of help from your site so thank you. I've got some pictures up for you and your site visitors to look at. I know I got a lot of ideas from looking at all the other pictures out there and came up with a design based on all those, so I hope someone else can benefit from my pictures. See http://bit.ly/LK64aN for pics.
The drum sounds great with a crisp snare and some good bass. I even installed a "rest bar" for the snares to rest against when they are not against the tapa so I have both a snare cajon and a non-snare cajon in one (with no rattle when it's off).
Thanks again for your help!
Justin
I will say that my impression is that you could make a tapa with a variety of different materials. Not sure which to suggest, but e.g. plexiglass or some other synthetic would probably sound the same or better (my guess, here). I just don't think using wood is necessary in a cajon -- I mean, we're using plywood here, after all, it's not like it's a matched spruce top on a guitar or something.
And I'm assuming that there's nothing breaking down in terms of the air seal for you, which may affect the bass.
There's also "aircraft grade" plywood, which may behave differently... I believe the stuff I looked at had the sheets 45 degrees from each other instead of plywood's typical 90 (so they could steam and form it, I understand?) -- maybe it would hold up better (and maybe it would just dull the same way, eventually).
Let us know what you find out!
When the Tapas are new, they sing, crisp open highs and extraordinary lows. After approx. 30 hours of play, they sound ... flat. Besides the obvious humidity problems (live in arizona so thats not a major factor) the Tapas seem to be breaking down really fast.
Any suggestions, thoughts, ideas?
Anyway, the boards are either 3" or 9" wide by 24" long by 5/16" thick and they're rough sawn.
I can run them through a planer to smooth them down a bit, then sand them smooth.
I've got a lot of Douglas Fir I can use for the frames as well.
Recently I made another rough recording in front of the workshop playing my foot hi-hat and pro rockbox combo, I'm more of a guitarist than a drummer but it sounds ok.
The recording was done with a zoom h2 field recorder with no post production/effects right on the road.... about 5 meters away.
http://www.cajon.com.au/images/soundfiles/rockboxpromodel.mp3
http://www.cajon.com.au/images/soundfiles/vibro%20darlo.mp3
This recording is really raw and unrehearsed, it me playing pro rockbox with pedal, slide guitar, blues harp and foot hi hat, the guitar is tuned in an open minor scale.
Hope you enjoy.
If anyone of you guys knows how to build one. Please be considerate to help me. Thanks
Your directions and self-critique are thoughtful and amazingly clear. Thanks for your efforts.
I have been doing some experimenting with aspects of the design as well, and I'm looking forward to updating this site in the next month or two with a lot more data on the physics/resonance issues (tapa, air chamber) and mic'ing samples that I've made over the last couple/few years. I've been threatening a site update for a year, but i swear it's coming. :-)
You could send an email to anything at caseyconnor.org and it'll get to me (as long as it's not a spammy address like sales@ or something), so feel free.
Thanks,
-c
I have been building cajon from allsorts of bits and pieces including old wooden speakers. The snare i have built using everything from bottle caps to guitar strings. I have had some success with micing up a cajon. I simply put a old mic head inside the cajon, I dont want to give the game away as it has taken me months to get a good working prototype. but if your interested i can send you an mp3 of the mic in the cajon and then details on how i did it?
cheers
andy
ps brilliant webpage, i like the phantom power checker a lot - i have one which plays a tune!
As for the door, someone else posted alternate ideas on doors to have the bottom open so that the weight of the player created the seal needed. I liked that idea, but then you would need to have a latch system. If you built the door in the top (cut the top board in halves or a 1/3 and 2/3 split, then the front half or third could be attached creating the rigidity needed while the back half or two-thirds could open as an access hatch. That way once you sit on it you create the seal.
We'll see how my first cajon turns out, and thanks in advance for all the ideas/inspiration!
If you're going to have a snare inside, though, and if you don't have some kind of fancy adjustment system you can access when it's done, then I do recommend some way of getting inside... maybe instead of glue for the back panel, a bunch of screws (like every few inches) if it comes to that (though if using plywood you'd want the frame pieces to screw in to if you're going that route, because screwing into the edge of plywood isn't the best). The door is a pain, and the next one I build may not have it, but I would always want some way of taking it apart (with the tapa still on).
-c
I love the rich tones especially when mic'd
The only change I am going to make is to add resting block , made of scrap wood and rug, for when I disengage the snares.
Thanks again
Faria
@ched - thanks!
-c
-About how much does this cost?
...hmmm, maybe around $30, if you build the one I've shown here? That's a very rough estimate. If you salvage a crate or some plywood from somewhere (or use a speaker cabinet from Goodwill, etc), make your own snares (though i don't recommend it, really), don't spend any money on finish or sandpaper, etc, then you could do it for almost nothing but the cost of screws and glue.
-Can I have two Tapa's one on the front for bass, one on the side for snares, which will be supported by frames much like the ones you use?
I think you should try it. The argument against it might be that the bass sound would suffer with less of a rigid enclosure backing it up, but it's worth a shot.
-Can I do this myself? I haven't really built like this before, (dont worry I'm an adult, as well as a general contractor, i do repairs on houses, with guidance).
Well, not knowing you personally, I can only say that generally it's one of the easiest instrument projects there are. Basically, build a box with a thin front and a hole in the back. I made the page to help people do it themselves. :-)
-how many days does this take?
I think two, minimum, since you have to wait for glue to dry a couple times. It took me maybe 4 to 6 hours each session, but i was moving slow and taking pictures and so forth.
Good luck,
-Casey
First of before my questions and what not, this web page is particularly inspiring. I, though inexperienced, have ideas for different things I could do, which I will mention.
Here are my questions...
-About how much does this cost?
-Can I have two Tapa's one on the front for bass, one on the side for snares, which will be supported by frames much like the ones you use?
-Can I do this myself? I haven't really built like this before, (dont worry I'm an adult, as well as a general contractor, i do repairs on houses, with guidance).
-how many days does this take?
Thank you for taking the time to make this website :) God bless you, I love you song btw is it on Itunes?
Or maybe what you meant is that one end of the snare is not in contact with the tapa?
Most "real"-snare setups do that: one end is off the tapa and the snare is angled toward the tapa with a little tension to press the snares against the tapa. In other words, it doesn't sit, tensioned, on the tapa like a snare on a snare drum would. The angle that it hits the tapa at and the tension with which it is held both dramatically affect the sound of the snare (as would the length of the snares, i assume), which is why i would urge you to build in some kind of adjustability into the system until you have it perfected. As long as you have a hole in the cajon you can reach a hand in there and tweak.
-c
thank you for the reply, i am still contemplating what snare system to use, for i am not going to be tweaking it.
thank you
That looks good to me. Can I use that image on this site? The only reason I wouldn't do it that way is for adjustability... especially if you don't have a door in the cajon for more access. But if you like the sound it results in, then go for it. It's a simple and effective way of getting the snares in place (though i'd probably put them slightly more towards the corners to help with kick/snare separation). Do you think that your snares are long enough? They look like they might be on the short side and thus give kind of a short "bark" of a snare, but I don't have much experience yet tweaking with real snares.
Personally I tweak so much with the snare that the next system I make will probably have a couple movable blocks with wingnuts and bolts, etc, to allow easy but stable positioning. My current "snare on a length of stiff wire" is kind of silly, obviously, from a stability standpoint, but it does allow for infinite adjustment, which is nice.
Glad the site was useful. I'm hoping to update/overhaul it in the next couple months... stay tuned.
-c
anyway, i have not made my cajon yet but was wondering, since the main problem seems to be the snare, how affective is the idea bellow??
(if you can't see it it's just half of the snare on each side, fixed there by a simple corner block on the top)
Thank you all for all the really helpful stuff, seriously :p
http://www.framedrums.net/wp-content/uploads/cajon-flamenco-snare.jpg
-c
@Christian - Thanks for asking, I should have made that clearer. Yes, the tapa screws into the frame, and the idea is that the tapa rests right against the frame. It's OK if it touches the edges of the sides of the box as well (everything flush), but the frame is there to be a surface against which the tapa attaches. I'm not sure how crucial this would be if you were using solid wood sides, but plywood isn't great at holding screws that go in through the edges (parallel to the lamination). I think that's the main reason for the frame in this case, but maybe they do it with solid-wood-sided cajons also, for some reason of bass resonance. As described in the article, the frame should be well glued to the sides, so that there is no air gap.
-Casey
Thanks
drkirkwellness@gmail.com
Look for the line that says "Here are the plans for the cajon depicted on this article, in various formats".
You will find all measurements in the plans.
best wishes for you
If you were to switch the locations of the eyes/hooks, then the hooks would be pulling the door closed, rather than pulling it to the side of the box.
It sounds like you are happy enough with what you have that there won't be a version 2, but that seemed a simple adjustment that I thought I would mention.
Now I need to go start cutting some wood... :)
Please see page 7, "snares": http://caseyconnor.org/jl/cajon?start=6
I don't think that the strings sound good, so I don't use them. Maybe in a cajon where the strings are longer, or maybe if you want a more traditional sound, they might be OK, I don't know. For me, the true snares (not strings) sound much better.
Re: the strings, Ocana says that it's a balance. They touch the tapa, there is no real space, and he even recommends trying a piece of tape in the center, if you're having trouble. But they shouldn't be too tight. You do not tighten them like guitar strings, as far as I know.
-c
Some do run wires vertically: see this link: http://caseyconnor.org/cajonstuff/cajon-munster-english.doc
(that link is on Page 10 of this article, "Other Links": http://caseyconnor.org/jl/cajon?start=9 ). Not my cup of tea, really, since it couples the bass/snare.
I don't know exactly what you mean by "placing it up vertically on the tapa". If it's still in the corners, I'd be happy, because I like to keep separate the snare and the bass sounds. If it's in the middle of the tapa, vertically, especially if you're talking about laying the entirety of the length of the snare against the tapa, then it will always be ringing, thus turning the cajon into a big, bassy, pseudo snare drum. I like the variety of sounds the cajon can make, so I put my clipped-off snares with their ends against the corners. Running wires along the face of the cajon may be the more traditional way to do it, and most "real" cajons I hear either have very short, barky snare sounds, and/or have wires that run the entire face of the cajon and always sound when you play the instrument, neither of which was my goal.
For lots of other snare images and ideas, see the "readers respond" page: http://caseyconnor.org/jl/cajon?start=10
Re: solid wood for the other surfaces: sure, see for example http://tonecajon.com/?page=available
As long as it's strong and dense and won't split, I think anything is fair game, there.
Good luck,
-c
Re: wood, see page 3, called, cleverly, "Wood and Frame": http://caseyconnor.org/jl/cajon?start=2 -- As far as species of wood are concerned, I doubt it makes much difference, since we're talking about laminate plywood here.
Re: Ocana, see the intro page, "Germán Ocaña".
Hi -
For the tapa, see page 3, called, cleverly, "wood and frame": http://caseyconnor.org/jl/cajon?start=2
For the snares, see page 7, called, cleverly, "snares": http://caseyconnor.org/jl/cajon?start=6
Good luck,
-Casey
@Job - see http://caseyconnor.org/jl/cajon?start=3 for info about the hole size issues. The size doesn't seem to matter so much, in my experience. The function of the hole is to "let the bass out", in a simple sense; the cajon "kick" sound is making a "thud" wavefront. Without the hole, the thud hangs out inside the box and doesn't come across as loudly. My personal conviction (as explained at that link) is that the hole isn't part of a "Helmholtz" model, where it "tunes" an air spring, so much as it just prevents the air pressure of the internal space from preventing the tapa from moving and allows the thud wavefront to escape. If the tapa vibrated like a traditional drum head membrane, then the hole might be relevant, as when playing a djembe you can insert or remove a fist in the hole to change the pitch of the drum.
Gluing/nailing: see http://caseyconnor.org/jl/cajon?start=4 -- nailing or screwing into the edge of standard laminate plywood doesn't really work, so you basically need to glue. Ocana also recommends this for the sake of a good air seal via the glue. The exception, sometimes, is the tapa, which you screw into the frame (the frame is in turn glued to the inside of the plywood). Some people also glue the tapa, but i prefer to leave mine removable.
@Richard - Yeah, generally the back panel is the same as the sides, with 12mm or thicker plywood (glued all around). It's important that the cajon be sturdy/rigid. Regarding the snares, see http://caseyconnor.org/jl/cajon?start=6 ... I agree that the string-snares are not satisfying. There are a number of other ideas on that page, as well as links.
Glad the site is helpful,
-Casey
My original design borrowed your first snare idea, but across one corner only thinking that I could have a 'slap + snare' corner plus a 'slap only' corner. The snares were not very successful: if given a lot of tension they produced a distracting sort of hum. Now I have them slack and with a few loose wires wrapped around which is OK played lightly but I am working on alternatives and will post here if I have a breakthrough.
I did find that there was a nasty resonance from the back panel even though it was well screwed on, and cured that by using frameseal (the stuff that goes around window frames) applied from the inside (with the Tapa removed). I also glued a chunk of MDF to the inside of the back panel to deaden it. The bass seemed more solid after that.
Just for fun, we put an ordinary cheap PC mic inside it and played it through a computer sound card: if you want to hear that, and see the cajon, go to youtube.com/expertanswers.
Even without a microphone I am amazed at the range of sounds and dynamics you can extract from what is just a box.
Thanks
-----------------
I am thinking about building my own canjon and your experience will be very helpful I think! Can't you create a blog or something like that and share your experience? I'm sure there is many people that will appreciate!
-----------------
Yeah same here!
-----------------
-Casey
Like i said am not a pro or anything else but love the sound of this instrument.
The one i built is 18 inches tall by 12 inches wide. i did not install any type of resonating devices in it, just pure sound from what the tapa (face) would make.
I use it for the first time today at church, like i said am not a pro, but i got good results.
Thank you for all the vital information you have share with everybody else.
Thanks